🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that began as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass gatherings where African descendants are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the celebration is observed is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative gains confidence to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A effort to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an framework that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid governmental matters, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What use is simple recognition of the past when it ignores the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and awareness of minor insults, but confronted with the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.